Category: autonomous vehicles

  • Cadillac Ranger Reveals why Robots will never be his driver

    Cadillac Ranger Reveals why Robots will never be his driver

    giphy-1

    Play the song above while you read this to reveal its secret message!

    3 reasons why robots should never be your driver (from the cadillac ranger his-sef).

    At the risk of creating another stupid list, I am going to give you the 3 reasons that robots should not be given control of the roads. Because that is what it is my friends. Just as pedestrians and bicyclists were forced from the roadways with the introduction of the car in the last 1800’s – human driven cars are going to be disallowed from the roads with the advent of robotic cars. As surely as I am the Luddite, if we give an inch the robots will take it all. It will start with “Robot only” lanes. Then will proceed to whole roads where the robots are allowed without humans. Lastly – there will be no roads to drive for humans. This can only be stopped by not allowing the first step in this insidious plan to transpire. Autonomous cars should be banned. The 3 reasons are:

    1) They are killers.

    Robot Kills Human

    Self driving cars are unintentional killers. They will continue to kill. And when they kill – there is no blame. No-one is responsible. Sure – you can start holding Uber or Lyft responsible – but we all know that corporate responsibility will get eroded by lobbyist and the money that will be poured into the federal and state money grubbing politicians to sell our best interest down the river. Don’t believe that the killing will stop. They will make it safer for you by removing you from the streets. Thats the only answer. History is on the side of this answer.

    2) Your car will be Hacked

    giphy-4

    Above we saw the unintentional mayhem. But what about if it NOT unintentional?

    In a recent article Justin Ware imagined an obvious horror story with computerized self driving cars.

    The windows flick up. The doors lock. My eyes widen as the car violently accelerates. It rips across four lanes of traffic before careening off a bridge and into the murky depths of the Yarra River. I drown, unable to escape the questionable water quality.

    The cause? My car was hacked.

    As Bruce Schneier, a leading cybersecurity expert notes, “We know that computers are insecure and that we cannot build these systems without vulnerabilities”.

    “We build autonomous systems that affect the world in a direct, physical manner, we risk bad actors accessing it. We risk glitches and errors causing physical harm.”

    So your car is going to get hacked. Its just a fact. There is not a man, woman or child that owns a computer that has not gotten some type of virus. But the consequences of getting your car hacked can be far far worse.

    For instance – think about autonomous cars becoming the next wave of terrorist tools.

    In a 2015 paper, authored by Jeffrey W. Lewis (in collaboration with the Department of Homeland Security and the University of Maryland), the authors explored the potential adoption of autonomous vehicles in terrorism.

    “What if [ISIS] could reliably deliver their bombs without sacrificing their combatants?

    “More disturbing, what if less lethal groups already operating in Europe and the United States could gain the advantages of a vehicular suicide bomber without the challenges of recruiting, radicalising and training the bomber?,”

    Worth the risk? I’d hold off.

    3) Driving is fun

    giphy

    Driving is one of the few passions in life that people should enjoy. There is nothing better than driving to the beach on a balmy day. Sure – maybe its nice at times to think of an ‘autopilot’ feature, but the reality is that if we automate – then we lose control (per point above – there will be no shared roads).

    Don’t give up joy for convenience!

    If you like driving sometimes – you need to drive all the time. Or take a train. Or Walk.

    The Cadillac Ranger would never lets the robot drive. giphy-5

    Humans-Above-Technology-Logo-B1

    The organization behind TrustNoRobot is now a non-profit! Our mission is to promote humans above technology. Our simple belief is that technology should work for humans and better their condition and never have a negative impact on humanity. Please find it in your heart to donate to this important cause.

  • Precision German Ethical Trolling

    German Rules for autonomous vehicles can be read about here.

    These rules are a dangerous fantasy, created by well-intentioned ethicists but impossible to implement. They show clearly how the problem with autonomous vehicles is a non-trivial non-starter in their implementation in the real world.

    Under new ethical guidelines – drawn up by a government-appointed committee comprising experts in ethics, law and technology – the software that controls such cars must be programmed to avoid injury or death of people at all cost.

    That means that when an accident is unavoidable, the software must choose whichever action will hurt people the least, even if that means destroying property or hitting animals in the road, a transport ministry statement showed.

    The software may not decide on its course of action based on the age, sex or physical condition of any people involved.

    First, choosing whatever action will hurt people the least is something even humans cannot do. It’s the easy out of AI Utilitarianiam I have written about before. Glass and steel flying apart at speed is the definition of a chaotic system. Humans cannot predict the outcome of an accident, or have perfect knowledge of what the environment is. Accidents by definition happen faster than such decisions are possibly made consciously, which ticks behind experience at a good second of time. We might pretend that we made decisions after the accident, but in a real one your automatic systems are not weighing people’s gender identity.

    Second, are you telling me that a car, made by fallible engineers, is going to be able to determine the age, gender or physical condition of humans around it going 65mph down the highway?

    To say a car won’t make a decision based on the age of a subject, for instance, means you need to train your algorithms on age to ensure they ignore it. Otherwise, and this is the point, in a neural network you will never know why the decisions are made unless you control the training sets. And you can’t control the world, which is where people and cars exist.

    Let’s say that autonomous cars learn that driving near older people is less or more dangerous, even though they don’t know the people are older. Did they violate this rule? What if they learn that certain races drive better or worse through real world experience. Is this an unethical conclusion? How will we know? Machine Learning algorithms don’t talk and explain their actions or follow rules like this.

    There is no example of an entity besides a Divine one that would have a shot at knowing the world well enough to follow rules like this, and there is no way a Chevy is going to make validated ethical choices.

    It’s why the answer to the trolley problem for humans is to not allow people to stand on train tracks. And the solution to autonomous vehicles is to pass laws that require a human being to be behind the wheel at all times.

    Now, on the other hand if this list of rules is a way for German Ethicists to troll German auto manufacturers with impossible rules so they can continue to drive in the fast lane on the Autobahn: bravo.

    Painting by Simon Stålenhag

  • Trucking in the Right Direction

    It’s heartening to see manufacturers not betting on robots replacing humans, but on assisting them to do their jobs better and safer. This truck will make the roads safer for everyone:

    Daimler Trucks North America’s general manager for marketing and strategy, Kary Schaefer, says that the systems will have positive safety benefits and pointed to a 72-percent reduction in rear-end collisions with the automatic braking assist. (ABA is also claimed to reduce serious driver injuries by 78 percent and fatalities by 82 percent.) The safety benefits of lane departure protection are more modest, but even this system is touted as reducing crashes by 26 percent and serious driver injuries by 20 percent.

    It is my hope that when self driving vehicles happen, they will be viewed as an embarrassment and will not permeate popular culture. They will have their place in the tech stack of our modern world, as do other embarrassing technologies.

    Let’s make laws to ensure a human is always behind the wheel. Trust no robot, and do not trust the humans trying to displace and destroy the livelihood of other humans.

    Painting by Simon Stålenhag

  • Why Self Driving Cars Will Fail

    If you want the technical reasons why self driving cars will have practically insurmountable difficulties in the real world, I would recommend Artificial Unintellgence by Meredith Broussard. Excellent resource.

    But I don’t think the technical challenge will be the nail in the coffin. It will be people’s feelings.

    Humans don’t trust robot cars, or the motives of those building them, and have been attacking them with rocks and knives according to the NY Times:

    At least 21 such attacks have been leveled at Waymo vans in Chandler, as first reported by The Arizona Republic. Some analysts say they expect more such behavior as the nation moves into a broader discussion about the potential for driverless cars to unleash colossal changes in American society. The debate touches on fears ranging from eliminating jobs for drivers to ceding control over mobility to autonomous vehicles.

    “People are lashing out justifiably,” said Douglas Rushkoff, a media theorist at City University of New York and author of the book “Throwing Rocks at the Google Bus.” He likened driverless cars to robotic incarnations of scabs — workers who refuse to join strikes or who take the place of those on strike.

    “There’s a growing sense that the giant corporations honing driverless technologies do not have our best interests at heart,” Mr. Rushkoff said. “Just think about the humans inside these vehicles, who are essentially training the artificial intelligence that will replace them.”

    “They said they need real-world examples, but I don’t want to be their real-world mistake,” said Mr. O’Polka, who runs his own company providing information technology to small businesses.

    This is just the beginning. Those who think they can win this argument by saying “but robot cars are safer” are missing the point. Lots of safer alternatives in American life are rejected because of the perceived loss of freedom and control. It is safer to not jaywalk, but visit New York sometime. It is safer to not ride horses, skateboards, and motorcycles. It is safer to use a computer not connected to the internet.

    The thing that will stop the self driving car will be laws that require that robot actions be backed by humans. Humans who must make moral choices, who must observe.

    Driver assist will happen. Machine learning will make driving safer. But jumping to self driving cars is like suggesting that an AI could run a city government, and trying it out on real citizens, before the algorithm can even manage a MacDonald’s successfully first.

    As cities begin to pass regulations against self driving vehicles I will detail them on this blog.

    Painting by Simon Stålenhag

  • Hit and run

    8240722-6566655-image-m-30_1546894894691

    Hit and run report.

    Robots hitting robots is actually an interesting idea.   I’m watching the robot clubs in every high school build fighters and robots that compete in robot challenges.    Humans model out there evolutionary survival of the fittest in every aspect.   Evolution is happening right now everywhere and we are the fuel behind the rapid advancement of AI and Robots.   When we hit our limits and they start building themselves at scale, we will be lost.